FTCE Pre-K Prekindergarten PK-3 Test 2025 – 400 Free Practice Questions to Pass the Exam

The reasoning behind identifying that option is not a method of peer editing stems from the purpose and approach of peer editing itself. Peer editing involves collaborative processes where students engage with each other's work constructively, focusing on aspects that can enhance clarity, coherence, and overall quality.

The first choice highlights an important aspect of peer editing, which is to analyze and improve sentence variety. This engagement encourages students to think critically about their writing and that of their peers.

The second choice emphasizes the importance of questions during peer review. Asking questions helps clarify ambiguous points in the writing and leads to deeper understanding and improvement.

In the third option, working together on a final edit indicates collaboration and mutual support in enhancing the writing, which aligns with the goals of peer editing.

In contrast, deciding whether another student's essay is simply "good" or "poor" does not foster the constructive critique that peer editing aims for. It creates a judgmental atmosphere rather than a collaborative and supportive one, which is essential for effective peer editing. Students should be encouraged to provide specific feedback that can help their peers grow as writers, rather than assigning overall quality labels without constructive input.